On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:32:52 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:

>IMBJR wrote:
>> It is not lazy, it is merely a part of the language.
>
>It's lazy in that you're trying to express your own emotions or invoke 
>responses in others without using words actually related to those 
>emotions, but which instead have connotations unrelated to the 
>discussion.

Sorry you have such a very narrow of such an expressive language.

> F'ing has nothing to do with JPEG2000, and is therefore 
>entirely off-topic for this discussion. But you're too lazy to try to 
>actually express your argument and then answer the counter-arguments 
>with anything but profanity and insults.

Hahahahahaha! Make me laugh. You are arguing that words are nothing to
do with JPEG2000! Well that's true - but such an incredibly pointless
argument. Plus, indirectly, of course they are - since they are used
to form a description of the standard and to debate the use of the
format.

Looks like I've got you obsessing over the use of the word 'lazy'. Try
slapping your head, it might dislodge the word.

>
>Of course, next you tell me that I must not have read the thread, 
>because otherwise I'd have to agree with you.

Well, Mr. Parrot, do I have to do that? Surely you've got the message
by now. Dear me, slow on the uptake or what?

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message